Understanding how employees contribute to projects is an important part of team development. Organizations need to know not only what people do well, but also how they approach new ideas, problem-solving, collaboration and execution. Different assessment frameworks offer ways to explore these preferences, helping managers distribute responsibilities and build more complementary teams.
One framework gaining attention in organizational development is Working Genius, developed by Patrick Lencioni and The Table Group. It identifies six types of working contributions: Wonder, Invention, Discernment, Galvanizing, Enablement and Tenacity. The model is designed to help individuals understand which activities energize them, which they find frustrating and how they contribute to group work.
However, companies may want to explore additional assessment approaches that cover a broader range of behavioral characteristics and strengths. This can be particularly useful for organizations that want to connect individual insights with communication, leadership and relationships across entire teams.
Best Working Genius alternative
Cloverleaf offers a multi-assessment platform that combines behavioral, personality and strengths-based frameworks to help organizations understand how employees approach work and collaborate. Rather than reproducing Working Genius’s six-contribution model, Cloverleaf provides access to assessments such as CliftonStrengths, Strengthscope, DISC, Enneagram and 16 Types, offering different perspectives on individual capabilities and workplace behavior.
Through its assessment platform, companies can bring multiple assessment results into a centralized profile. CliftonStrengths identifies an individual’s leading talent themes, while Strengthscope focuses on strengths that energize and engage people at work. DISC provides insight into behavioral and communication tendencies, and Enneagram explores underlying motivations.
These frameworks can help organizations examine questions that overlap with the goals of Working Genius, such as how people prefer to contribute, where they may find energy in their work and how their strengths complement those of colleagues. However, the assessments measure different constructs and should not be treated as interchangeable with the six Working Genius types.
Cloverleaf’s Relationship Intelligence Engine adds a team-level dimension to these individual profiles. It synthesizes assessment results to examine how employees may interact, where differences could create friction and how colleagues can adapt their communication. This can help managers understand how individual strengths and working preferences influence collaboration across projects.
The platform also connects assessment data with AI-powered coaching. Employees receive personalized recommendations through tools such as Slack, Microsoft Teams and email. These suggestions can help them prepare for meetings, communicate with colleagues, navigate disagreements and apply their strengths in everyday work situations.
For learning and development teams, Cloverleaf provides centralized assessment management, team dashboards and reporting. Organizations can select the frameworks that align with their development programs rather than requiring every employee to complete the same assessment. The platform also allows assessment insights to be mapped to company values, competency models and leadership frameworks.
When evaluating a Working Genius alternative, organizations should consider what they want to understand about their workforce. Companies primarily interested in identifying the six types of working contributions may prefer to use Working Genius directly. Those seeking a broader view of behavioral preferences, strengths, motivations and interpersonal relationships may benefit from a platform that combines multiple assessments.
Cloverleaf’s approach is based on bringing these different perspectives together and connecting them with ongoing coaching. This makes it an option for organizations that want to move beyond a single framework and use assessment insights to support broader team development.
